Skip to main content

Staff Working Paper No. 686: Eight centuries of the risk-free rate: bond market reversals from the Venetians to the ‘VaR shock’ - Paul Schmelzing - Bank of England



In the midst of historically low interest rates in advanced economies following the Great Financial Crisis and renewed discussions about “secular stagnation” (Hansen, 1939; Summers, 2016), sovereign bond markets have reflected the depressed yield environment and enjoyed years of above-average (price) returns. The current “bull market” in bonds, however, originated prior to 2008 – mirroring the structural dynamics in global inflation rates, which inflected as Paul Volcker’s “war on inflation” triggered by the Oil Shocks started bearing fruit (Goodfriend 1993; Rachel and Smith 2015): it has been recognized that 1981 marked the beginning of a “bull market” period of rising prices and falling yields (Homer and Sylla, 1991), as bond prices typically incorporate investors’ assessment of future inflation and interest rates over the lifetime of the asset (in addition to liquidity, default risk, and term premia considerations, cf. Drake and Fabozzi, 2011).
Yet, after 36 years of secularly falling risk-free rates, a significant proportion of sovereign debt recording negative yields, and short-term fallouts such as the 2013 “Taper Tantrum”, more often the enthusiasm in policy and market circles has been giving way in recent years to concerns about an unprecedented “bond bubble” which could eventually inflict significant losses upon holders of government debt. Are such fears warranted? And if we accept the proposition that the bond market shows signs of a “bubble”, how have such conditions normalized in the past? In contrast to the academic references on the history of equity bubbles, the history of bond market reversals remains relatively unexplored territory. This is partly due to a lack of consistent historical data necessary to undertake empirical work in bond markets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How The Economic Machine Works by Ray Dalio - Bridgewater

Source: How The Economic Machine Works by Ray Dalio

Letter: Why the geopolitics of international currency choice matters - FT

This coincidence must alert readers that a tempest is brewing on subjects noted: lurking inflation, increasing debt, suppressed interest rates and the shifting of hegemonic power.  There are only two important questions in investing that also apply to subjects impacting the future stability of the world — tell me why and tell me when.  Plender gives us the “why”, the ever-increasing “intolerable burden” of government debt and suppressed rates leveraging the global financial system. He gives us the tipping point.  What we await is “the when”, as in when do we know we have “tipped”.  Paul Hackett Madison,  NJ, US    Letter: Why the geopolitics of international currency choice matters

Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed - Martin Wolf - Financial Times

Intellectually, at least, today’s Warsh appears the same as the one of 2010. In his IMF lecture delivered in April 2025, he stressed not only the Fed’s “institutional drift”, but also its recent “failure to satisfy an essential part of its statutory remit, price stability. It has also contributed to an explosion of federal spending. And the Fed’s outsized role and underperformance have weakened the important and worthy case for monetary policy independence.” He made other criticisms, the most pointed being that “the Fed has been the most important buyer of US Treasury debt — and other liabilities backed by the US government — since 2008”. He asserts: “Fiscal dominance — where the nation’s debts constrain monetary policymakers — was long thought by economists to be a possible end-state. My view is that monetary dominance — where the central bank becomes the ultimate arbiter of fiscal policy — is the clearer and more present danger.” For Warsh, then, easy money is the road to ruin.  ...